13 posts found
Recording a client meeting with an AI note-taker triggers three Canadian consent and recordkeeping rules. The Criminal Code, PIPEDA, and CIRO each ask a separate question. Practical scripts and a CRM audit trail for advisors.
CIRO's five-factor suitability standard and Staff Notice 31-368 show what meeting documentation must demonstrate. The gap is smaller than you think.
Canadian advisors face three regulatory layers US guidance ignores: PIPEDA, CIRO, and Quebec Law 25. What each ChatGPT tier means for compliance.
CIRO has no formal AI policy, but the 2026 Compliance Report signals exactly what examiners will ask about AI in your practice.
Attention residue from unfinished documentation follows you into your next client meeting. The fix is not discipline. It is a system that closes the loop.
Three confidence gaps compliance officers need closed before approving AI. Data defensibility, vendor longevity, and advisor risk understanding.
Distraction during client meetings is a systems gap, not a personal failing. The most present advisors are not more talented at focusing. They are more prepared.
RRSP season does not create documentation debt. It reveals the gap between what your systems were designed to handle and what February demands.
From one advisor's frustration with ChatGPT to a compliance-first meeting notes tool built from the ground up for Canadian financial advisors.
Only 11% of organisations have deployed AI agents in production. The more predictable path to AI benefit is optimising the workflows you already perform.
Meeting transcription combines four compliance risk factors no other AI tool shares. Why it creates unique exposure for Canadian financial advisors.
Safe AI starts with four questions, not a tool recommendation. A practical compliance framework for Canadian financial advisors.
A practical starting point for advisors who want honest guidance, not hype. AI doesn't threaten what makes you valuable. It threatens what makes you busy.
